<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artists May Be Like Athletes&#8230;But Art is Not</title>
	<atom:link href="/latest-issue/vol-2-the-path-of-new-musicians/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel-ii-a-response-from-andrew-swensen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://musedialogue.org</link>
	<description>A journal for contemplation and discussion of the arts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikehoey@earthlink.net</title>
		<link>https://musedialogue.org/latest-issue/vol-2-the-path-of-new-musicians/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel-ii-a-response-from-andrew-swensen/#comment-5209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikehoey@earthlink.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musedialogue.org/?page_id=2054#comment-5209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the question &#039;Whay is art?&#039; can of course only be answered subjectively, it seems obvious to me that everything is art, and everybody is an artist.  The bigger question--also subjective--is:  &#039;Can this art show me something that is worth my time?&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the question &#8216;Whay is art?&#8217; can of course only be answered subjectively, it seems obvious to me that everything is art, and everybody is an artist.  The bigger question&#8211;also subjective&#8211;is:  &#8216;Can this art show me something that is worth my time?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themusedialogue</title>
		<link>https://musedialogue.org/latest-issue/vol-2-the-path-of-new-musicians/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel-ii-a-response-from-andrew-swensen/#comment-5153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themusedialogue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musedialogue.org/?page_id=2054#comment-5153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To argue that computer programming is an art is not a rebuttal to the article. In fact, it could well be a support of the article, and so I look forward to your upcoming comments. 

Computer programming can be an art if it generates art. The distinction in the article is about goals and outcomes. I have seen computer programmers generate a great deal of art. I have also seen computer programmers generate things that are not art -- though certainly are works of talent, skill, and mastery. Wood carvers, painters, and weavers can all make things that are art, and things that are not art. My principal point is the fact that their skill or talent alone does not define the outcome as art.

Best,

Andrew Swensen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To argue that computer programming is an art is not a rebuttal to the article. In fact, it could well be a support of the article, and so I look forward to your upcoming comments. </p>
<p>Computer programming can be an art if it generates art. The distinction in the article is about goals and outcomes. I have seen computer programmers generate a great deal of art. I have also seen computer programmers generate things that are not art &#8212; though certainly are works of talent, skill, and mastery. Wood carvers, painters, and weavers can all make things that are art, and things that are not art. My principal point is the fact that their skill or talent alone does not define the outcome as art.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Andrew Swensen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>https://musedialogue.org/latest-issue/vol-2-the-path-of-new-musicians/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel/artists-athletes-and-the-passion-to-excel-ii-a-response-from-andrew-swensen/#comment-5152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franklin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 19:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musedialogue.org/?page_id=2054#comment-5152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa. The gauntlet has been thrown. As a computer programmer, I believe that programming is first and foremost an art, so I&#039;m going to write a rebuttal to the entire mindset that this article seems to have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa. The gauntlet has been thrown. As a computer programmer, I believe that programming is first and foremost an art, so I&#8217;m going to write a rebuttal to the entire mindset that this article seems to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
